HyperTexting Analysis: No Ads, Algorithms, or AI Slop

My phone has two kinds of reading on it. There is the reading I choose, saved essays, odd blogs, newsletters from people whose names I recognize. Then there is the reading that happens to me, a thumb powered drift through whatever a platform decides should arrive next. The strange thing is that the second kind often wins, not because it is better, but because it is shaped like a habit. That is why HyperTexting is more interesting than its simple premise suggests. It is not trying to invent a new social graph from scratch. It is asking whether the open web can borrow the muscle memory of social media without inheriting the business logic that made so many feeds feel exhausting.

The feed escaped

the platform Gizmodo’s AJ Dellinger framed HyperTexting as a new app that promises an endless web experience with “no advertisements, algorithms, or AI slop.” That phrase is doing a lot of work. It names the three things many people now associate with modern feeds: monetized interruption, invisible ranking, and synthetic filler. According to Gizmodo, HyperTexting was built by Caleb Hailey, described as a 20 year tech industry veteran and RSS feed evangelist. TechCrunch similarly described the app as turning the open web into a scrollable social media like feed. The product idea is almost mischievously simple: take websites, blogs, newsletters, and podcasts, then present them in the shape people already know how to use. The key design move is not that HyperTexting makes the web social. The web has always been social, just messier, more distributed, and less polished than the platforms that later organized it for us. HyperTexting’s bet is that the feed itself was never the villain. The question is who controls what enters it.

RSS gets a new outfit

The Indian Express reported that HyperTexting is available on iOS and uses RSS technology to deliver updates from websites and podcasts without relying on recommendation algorithms. That is the delightful reversal here. RSS, the plumbing of old internet subscriptions, is being recast as a modern social interface. For years, RSS has carried the faint smell of homework. It sounds like something you configure, not something you open while waiting for coffee. HyperTexting seems to understand that the open web does not just need better principles; it needs better ergonomics. People do not reject control because they dislike agency. They reject control when it asks them to become system administrators of their own attention. The Indian Express also noted that the app makes it easier to publish on personal websites instead of centralized social platforms. That matters because discovery and publishing have become tangled together. If the best way to be seen is to post inside a platform, then creators slowly adapt their work to that platform’s incentives. A feed for the open web suggests a different bargain: publish where you own the context, follow where you choose the sources.

The anti algorithm is still

a design choice Gizmodo’s writeup is useful because it resists treating HyperTexting as pure nostalgia. A feed without ads or recommendation algorithms is not automatically calmer, smarter, or more humane. It still has to decide how following works, how new sources are found, and how much friction belongs between curiosity and compulsion. That is where the phrase “no advertisements, algorithms, or AI slop” becomes less like a slogan and more like a product constraint. If you remove the machinery that usually fills the feed, you have to replace it with something: explicit follows, RSS, personal publishing, and maybe a healthier tolerance for missing things. The open web is not infinite because a model keeps producing more. It is infinite because people keep making strange, specific things in places that do not all look alike. TechCrunch’s description of HyperTexting as a social media like feed for the open web points to a larger industry lesson. The next wave of social products may not need to defeat incumbents by becoming bigger networks. They may succeed by taking one familiar interaction, the scroll, the follow, the post, and moving it into a less centralized environment.

What builders should notice next The constructive lesson is not that every app

should revive RSS or reject algorithms entirely. The lesson is that interface familiarity can be separated from platform dependency. HyperTexting takes the part of social media people understand instantly, the feed, and attaches it to sources users intentionally choose, according to the Indian Express and Gizmodo’s descriptions. For product teams, that is a sharper prompt than another argument about whether algorithms are good or bad. Ask what your users want automated, and what they want authored. Ask whether personalization is serving discovery, or quietly substituting for taste. Ask whether your product could make people feel more connected without making them more dependent. HyperTexting may remain a niche app, or it may point toward a broader return to user directed discovery. Either way, its most useful contribution is conceptual. It reminds us that the internet’s future is not only a contest between centralized feeds and chaotic browsing. There is a third possibility: familiar interfaces wrapped around user chosen paths. If the open web can feel as easy as a social feed, what else have we mistaken for a platform feature when it was really just a design pattern?